You put $20 into an Instagram ad and let it run for a few days. The views are nothing exciting, nobody is really sending you a message, and when the money runs out, you try again with another post.

After doing this a few times, it is easy to arrive at the conclusion that Meta ads simply do not work anymore.

But the problem may not be Meta ads themselves. Sometimes, it is how the budget is being spent, the audience you are trying to reach, how long you keep running the same ad, or even the results you are paying attention to.

If you run a service-based business and Facebook or Instagram ads have recently felt like a waste of money, here are five things to check before you spend another dollar on Meta ads, plus what you could do differently if you had a $500 budget to work with.

Before deciding that your Facebook or Instagram ads are not working, the most obvious thing to check is whether Meta is actually showing the ad to people.

There is a difference between an ad that is delivering but producing poor results and an ad that is not delivering at all. If Ads Manager shows statuses such as “Not Delivering,” “Error,” “Rejected,” or “Update Required,” you may have a technical or account-level problem rather than a marketing problem.

A new ad may still be under review, for example. Meta notes that you may need to wait up to 24 hours to see delivery, so an ad that has only been active for a short period does not necessarily need to be deleted and recreated immediately.

Your payment method, account spending limit, and campaign schedule are also worth checking. An old spending limit that you forgot about can stop campaigns once the account reaches that amount, while scheduling settings can make an ad appear as “Not Delivering” outside the hours you selected.

Let us say you have $100 to advertise your business. You create four campaigns, put different audiences in each one, add several ad sets, and then give each ad a few dollars to spend.

Technically, you are advertising, but in reality, you may be making it difficult to learn what works.

This is one reason repeatedly spending $20 or $25 on separate campaigns can become frustrating. A small budget can produce results, but constantly starting, stopping and splitting that money across different campaigns may leave you with very little useful information about what actually caused someone to enquire or buy.

The campaign strategy we reviewed takes the opposite approach. Rather than creating lots of campaigns and ad sets, it consolidates more of the account and generally uses fewer ad sets, allowing more conversion data to sit within fewer places for Meta to optimise.

This does not mean that spending $20 on an ad can never work. The bigger issue is spending $20 today, another $20 on a completely different campaign next week, and another $25 somewhere else without developing a clear picture of what is actually producing results.

It is tempting to think that the more specific your audience is, the better your advertising will become.

Imagine you run a beauty service in Lagos. You might start narrowing your audience by age, gender, location, and several different interests because you want Meta to find your “perfect customer.”

The problem is that you can narrow things so much that Meta does not have enough people to work with.

Audience size is one of the reasons an ad may struggle to deliver. Multiple ad sets targeting similar groups can also create unnecessary overlap, with your own campaigns effectively competing for the same people.

The strategy we reviewed uses a broader approach in many cases, allowing Meta more room to optimise rather than creating a different audience for every interest a potential customer might have.

This does not mean targeting no longer matters. If you provide a physical service in Lagos, for example, location obviously matters. The point is that adding more and more targeting conditions does not automatically make an audience better.

Finding an ad that works is great, but it creates another problem: eventually, you need something else that works too.

One strategy worth considering is separating testing from scaling. The scaling campaign contains ads that have already demonstrated that they can generate results, while a separate testing campaign gives new creatives an opportunity to spend and prove themselves.

Why separate them?

If you put a new creative beside an established winner, Meta may continue allocating most of the money to the ad it already knows can perform. The new ad gets very little spend, which means you never really find out whether it could have performed even better.

At the same time, you cannot assume that an ad that works today will continue performing at the same level forever. People may repeatedly see the same creative and gradually stop paying attention to it.

This is why testing should not begin only when your best-performing ad stops working. You should be learning what else your audience responds to while your existing ads are still performing.

“My ad only got 2,000 views.”

Okay, but what were you actually trying to achieve?

This matters because a service business is not necessarily advertising for views. You may want appointment bookings, WhatsApp conversations, phone calls, consultation requests or completed lead forms.

An ad with 50,000 views and no serious enquiries can be less useful than one with 5,000 views that produces ten qualified leads.

This is also why choosing the right campaign objective matters. If what you really want is leads, your campaign should be designed around getting and measuring leads rather than celebrating engagement that does not move anyone closer to becoming a customer.

Instead of asking only how many people saw your ad, start asking questions such as: How many people enquired? How much did each enquiry cost? How many of those enquiries were serious? And, eventually, how many became paying customers?

Those numbers tell you much more about whether your advertising is working than views alone.

Now back to the $20 problem we started with.

Imagine instead that your service business has $500 available for Meta advertising. We would not assume that the answer is simply to spend more per day. We would use the additional budget to create a proper testing process.

The first job would be making sure the basics are right: the account can deliver, tracking works where necessary, the offer is clear, and there is an easy path from seeing the ad to making an enquiry.

Then we would develop a small number of genuinely different creatives. For example, a service business could test a customer testimonial, a before-and-after transformation, a founder explaining the customer's problem, and a straightforward offer-led ad.

Not four versions of the same graphic with different colours, but four different reasons for someone to pay attention.

From there, part of the campaign can focus on testing those ideas while the ads that demonstrate stronger results are given room to scale. The idea is to continue finding potential winners without making every new creative compete directly with ads Meta already knows can perform.

We would not promise that $500 will produce 20, 50 or 100 customers because nobody can responsibly guarantee that without knowing the business and its actual campaign data.

What $500 can give you, when used properly, is something potentially more valuable: enough room to stop guessing.

You can start seeing which creative generates enquiries, what a lead costs, which messages attract serious prospects, and whether those prospects eventually become paying customers. That gives you actual information to work with when deciding what to do with the next $500.

Meta ads have changed, and running Facebook and Instagram advertising can feel more frustrating when you are spending money without seeing obvious results. But “Meta ads are not working” can cover several very different problems.

Your ad may not actually be delivering. Your budget may be spread across too many campaigns. Your targeting may be limiting Meta too much. You may have relied on the same ads for too long, or you may simply be measuring views when what your business actually needs is enquiries and customers.

That is why throwing another $20 at a random Instagram post is not always the answer.

Before spending again, understand what happened with the last money and use that information to decide what you should test next.

Your Meta ads may not be working because of delivery issues, a spending limit, payment problems, narrow targeting, restrictive bid settings or ad fatigue. Start by checking whether the campaign is not delivering at all or whether it is delivering but simply not producing the results you want.

An active ad with no impressions can be affected by issues such as audience size, bidding, account spending limits, scheduling, or the review process. Check the Delivery column in Ads Manager first because it can help identify what may be preventing the ad from being shown.

A $20 campaign can generate results, but there is no guarantee that it will. The bigger problem is repeatedly spending small amounts on disconnected campaigns without enough structure to understand what is working. If your budget is limited, keeping the campaign simple and being deliberate about what you are testing may be more useful than spreading the money across several campaigns and audiences.

For a small service business, $500 can provide a more meaningful testing budget, but it does not guarantee a particular number of leads or customers. Your results will depend on factors such as your service, location, creative, targeting and the action you want potential customers to take.

Till next time,

Team Thrive

_____________________________________________________

A few lines to keep you motivated, going, and on top of the world